Criminal Defense Attorney Wins big in Chicago

 

Chicago Criminal Defense Lawyer Wins Cases

 

MOTION TO REDUCE GRANTED – CLASS X FELONY NARCOTICS SITUATION REJECTED

When cops enter somebody’s home without a search warrant, the assumption is that such an entrance is prohibited. Under the majority of conditions, any proof confiscated as a result of that kind of access will certainly be “suppressed”. That essentially implies that the instance can not be prosecuted even more and will certainly be dismissed said Robert Callahan – Chicago criminal attorneys

In a current instance, the Supreme Court detailed exactly how the Constitution protects every U.S. citizen from illegal searches and also seizures. The court stated: “The principal evil versus which the Fourth Amendment is guided is physical access right into the house.” Click here for more information about criminal defense

Our most current termination is an archetype of how hefty handed search techniques by cops can often backfire on them. A huge quantity of cocaine, ecstasy and also marijuana were all ruled inadmissible as a result of a warrantless entrance into a house. Call Robert J. Callahan – a Chicago criminal defense

In 2015 authorities replied to a sound issue at an apartment on the north side of Chicago. It was noticeable that an event was taking place when the policemans knocked on the door. When NT responded to the door, police officers can smell a strong odor of burning cannabis coming from within. They asked NT to turn the music down, and he said he would quickly. NT after that tried to close the door. Among the officers stuck his means of access, and forced his means into the apartment. Inside they recuperated over 200 ecstasy pills, several extra pounds of marijuana, and over 50 grams of cocaine from NT’s pocket.

We filed a movement to reduce proof as well as the court conducted a hearing in May 2017.

Throughout the hearing, the policeman affirmed that he never ever placed his means of access. He claimed that after scenting cannabis, he simply “jabbed his head inside” and gazed down the hall. He asserted he after that saw a number of mason containers including marijuana. Therefore, he positioned NT under arrest and browsed the home.

It is not unusual for policemans to minimize misconduct or perhaps lie to aim to legitimize a negative (unconstitutional) apprehension. With great preparation, study, as well as audio cross-examination, we could typically defeat such habits, which’s just what took place below.

The judge agreed with our analysis of the Constitutional legislation. We said that also “jabbing your head inside” was an offense against the fourth amendment as well as NT’s legal rights. The judge reduced all the seized evidence as well as the instance was dismissed.

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn